Tonawanda News

Local News

October 30, 2013

CONFER: A look at state Props 2, 3 and 6


Tonawanda News — Even though the Great Recession has allegedly gone, the upstate economy is still in crisis mode, with weakened and dead employers, and families trying to overcome their own financial struggles. We don’t need to add more debt payments to the high tax loads faced by all.

If you want to add nice things to a community or fix old infrastructure, you must work within your limits and find cuts elsewhere – just as the affected businesses and residents do in their day-to-day lives.

Proposition 6 would increase the maximum age until which state judges may serve as follows: a Supreme Court justice would be eligible for five additional 2-year terms after the present retirement age of 70 (three such terms are currently authorized); and a judge of the Court of Appeals who reaches age 70 while in office would be permitted to remain in for up to another 10 years.

Proponents of Prop 6 say that it makes no sense to force physically and mentally capable seniors out of work as is done now, and that the proposition ensures that the most seasoned and experienced judges remain at the bench. People live far longer than they did in 1869, when this was last amended.

Opponents of Prop 6, including me, dislike it for a variety of reasons. It would create a two-tiered system in which state judges can retire later than local judges, whose retirement age of 70 would remain. The proposition would ultimately add more Supreme Court judges to bloated employment rolls while they have the lightest workload of New York judges.

Proposition 6 also seems like it was selfishly conceived. The person behind its development and push through the state legislature is Chief Judge Jonathan Lippman. If the proposition fails, he has to retire in 2015, and if it passes, he can sit for another 4 years.

Bob Confer is a Gasport resident and vice president of Confer Plastics Inc. in North Tonawanda. Email him at

Text Only
Local News